The latest controversy that makes twitter heads explode is
the observable fact that Wonder Woman, the titular character in the upcoming
movie, has no hair at all in her underarms. They look quite polished. And even
though she is a superheroine who can hold her own with Batman and Superman,
extremists who have their hair tied back so tightly it interferes with brain
circulation claim that this is a sign of being dominated by the patriarchy. If
only we had known it was so easy.
Gal Gadot, former combat trainer in the Israeli military and
the former Miss Israel in the 2004 Miss Universe contest and
former model, now turned actress. 5’10”
photo by Gage Skidmore
There are more pressing issues: How does Superman shave?
Does he use razors with Kryptonite edges? And why isn’t Bruce Wayne horribly
scarred up? Considering his lack of superpowers and all the fights he’s been
in, he would be in pretty sad shape.
Or perhaps the world of superheroes isn’t meant to be
completely realistic. How many women have you met in real life who looked like
the Wonder Woman in the comic books or in the movies?
And this controversy does the opposite of showing the
oppression of women. In The Hobbit,
Bilbo Baggins was referred to as a “child of the kindly west.” You have to be a
child of the kindly west (or part or an elite elsewhere) to have the time and
energy to fuss about this, considering how women are treated in the majority of
the world. So relax and enjoy a comic book fantasy.
How does Supeman shave! Love it. Such a good point.
ReplyDeleteWow, I hadn't heard of this controversy. Can't people just be happy there IS a Wonder Woman movie, and leave it at that?
ReplyDelete