Suppose your troops have managed to retreat to a tree line
in the dark of night. The automated troops who chased you have found the range
of the tree line with their rockets. But they stay outside the range of your
grenade launchers, and your troops’ bullets do not harm them.
What do you do?
If you’re Lieutenant Katja Emmes, you charge forward out of
the tree line, ordering your troops to do the same.
When she gets twenty meters forward, she targets one of the
automated soldiers, and her troops destroy it with grenades. Ditto for the next
and the next, while the enemy rockets harmlessly hit the tree line behind them.
They send the enemy reeling back, but have to retreat themselves when artillery
fire comes down around them.
Virtues of War is
one of the best military science fiction novels I’ve read in a long time. Set
far enough in the future for there to be major colonized worlds that can
challenge Earth, yet close enough to our time that all the human interactions
are familiar, Bennett R. Coles was written what may be an instant classic.
Assigned to the fast attack craft Rapier, Lieutenant Emmes punches her way through brutal fighting,
whether on a planet or on board an enemy ship. Although brave to the point of
taking on suicidal risks, she is not immune to the emotional baggage of war and the internecine backstabbing that comes with it.
Coles describes with gritty detail the physical shocks that
Emmes and a few other main characters endure when going to and from combat, much
less from the battles themselves. This is no rah-rah book; he throws in our
faces some of the morally ambiguous acts performed during war. And the machinations
of an intelligence officer puke can really mess things up.
Overall, Virtues of
War features fully-realized characters hurtling into one gritty situation
after another. Bennett R. Coles was an officer for fourteen years in the
Canadian Navy, and it shows.
I don't usually read much sci-fi, but it does sound good.
ReplyDeleteGreat review. This sounds like an interesting read.
ReplyDeleteI love SF, but the gadgets and techno stuff are only supposed to be a backdrop for a compelling plot, and I didn't hear one in your review. I read you review of The Host too. You wrote a clever and deep analysis. I'd have never thought about the WofO comparison and it was fascinating!
ReplyDelete