I’m
throwing down the gauntlet. I am in favor of the Oxford comma, and I defy those
who think otherwise. What is this divisive comma? Glad you asked.
Tom, Dick, and Harry
|
The
Oxford comma goes before the conjunction towards the end of a list. In the
above example, the comma occurs after Dick. Without that comma, the list is
Tom, Dick and Harry.
(We
Americans tend to call it the serial comma, which sounds so pedestrian in
comparison.)
The
Oxford comma has gone in and out of style. But style is a matter for ties, not
punctuation. When I grew up, we were drilled on using that final comma, and we
would be marked down for not using it.
Things
changed. A writing professor in college told us we did not need that final
comma. She said the word “and” separated the last two items, so what did we
need the comma for? She asked that of the class defiantly.
I
think it obvious the word “and” connects the two items together—after all,
that is the job of that particular conjunction.
Things
changed again while I was an adult. A seminar teacher told us of the legal case
of Tom, Dick and Harry.
Tom, Dick and Harry
A reason to sue
|
A
man specified in his will that his estate should be divided equally among Tom,
Dick and Harry. This was taken to mean each would get a third. Tom sued, saying
it meant he should get 50%, and the other two would get 50%. Tom won.
See?
Conjunctions
do whatever they are supposed to, but commas separate. Period.
So
I hope everyone out there is in favor of the Oxford comma. If not, bring an
argument.
I love Oxford commas too. But I've never heard of that legal case. Fascinating!
ReplyDeleteMark, I totally agree! I hate when that comma isn't used cuz it def groups the later two together. I still use it, but I've accepted not everyone does. :(
ReplyDeleteI like and use the Oxford comma, too.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI'm a diehard proponent of the Oxford comma. Even in rushed academic emails-- i.e. 97% of the writing I do these days-- I use that comma to ensure clarity and to avoid the Tom-Dick-Harry confusion described in your post.
ReplyDelete